Psychoanalysis > Dream Interpretation > Papers |
||||||||||||
[ The Key of Dreams and Psychoanalysis - continue ] The psychoanalytic and the classical method Freud's statement that dream is the accomplishment of an unconscious wish creates the impression that psychoanalysis brought
a revolutionary contribution in the realm of interpretation. Because it is supposed to posses, in this regard, a vision considered as "scientific", radically opposite to the popular, or traditional one. The
facts are not at all like that. If we study the classification of dreams in the antiquity - and I especially refer here to Macrobius' work Comments upon Scipio's vision -
we notice that the tradition also remarked the dreams with a "scientific" content, the same type as those approached by psychoanalysis. On short, Macrobius distinguishes four categories of
dreams. Three of them are interesting to the interpretation work, while the last one remains, so to say, the deal of common people. The first three categories include: symbolical dream, vision dream and
oracular dream. (6) The last one refers to the dreams that comes from the nocturnal ebullition of our daytime impressions. We could clearly notice that the this last category defines the dreams examined by Freud. The conclusion would be: the ancient mentality also had the knowledge of the dreams of "profane" nature, namely those that aren't worth to be interpreted, but which, later on, represented the subject matter of
the psychoanalytical "scientific" research! On the other hand, it is obvious that, being interested in the "profane" dreams, having doubts concerning the traditional mentality - from a
scientific position - Freud ignored the sacred dreams (the first three categories at Macrobius). He gave thus the sensation that these could be included to the chapter of wish-dreams, familiar to him, when they are not the result
of the poetical, philosophyical or religious intended creation. Notes:
<<<< Back to the Dreams Section of the Site or to the Home Page
|
||||||||||||